🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.